INMU KING Vanished From JOYSOUND. Why Did the Person Who Stopped It Become Suspect Too?

How reading tools work

Listen reads the article aloud. Speed read shows phrases in sequence at your chosen pace. Language practice compares available translations. Save keeps a bookmark in this browser; find it in the player’s bookmarks.

Share this article
Advertisement
Advertisement

A viral Japanese meme song was briefly headed for a karaoke catalog. Then its uploader reported that the entry had been removed. The internet's next target was unexpected: the imaginary employee who recognized the reference and objected. Approve it, and you're a fan. Reject it, and how did you know?

A karaoke announcement with a remarkably short lifespan

On October 13, 2026, the creator behind “INMU KING / YAJU-MC” announced that the song had been registered with JOYSOUND, a major Japanese karaoke service. The proposed release time was 10 a.m. on October 16.

Later that same day, the creator reported an immediate removal. People who wanted to sing were directed back to playing the music video or a karaoke-style video from a connected phone.

JOYSOUND has not publicly established the specific reason for this individual removal in the materials checked here. The creator's cryptic reference to “something” happening soon became part of the joke.

The meme where recognizing a meme makes you guilty

“INMU” refers to a long-running Japanese internet subculture that grew out of quotes and remixes associated with adult material. “Inmu-chū” is a teasing label for someone deeply familiar with those references.

One social-media joke imagined a reviewer thinking, “If I flag this as INMU, everybody will know I recognized it. Maybe I should just approve it.” A heroic colleague then blurts out, “It's INMU. Don't let it through!”

The punchline arrives immediately: How did that hero recognize it?

That is the trap. The act of warning others gets treated as evidence of belonging to the very fandom being flagged. None of this is testimony about real JOYSOUND employees; it is a fictional office sketch invented around the announcement.

Four decisions, one ridiculous accusation

Imagine the imaginary review desk.

  • Approve the song: “A secret INMU fan must work at JOYSOUND.”
  • Reject the song: “You recognized it awfully quickly.”
  • Point to inappropriate lyrics: “Interesting how closely you studied them.”
  • Offer no detailed explanation: “What are you hiding?”

The logic is deliberately unfair. It converts knowledge into supposed participation, then treats every response as confirmation. Even the brave reviewer who speaks up is condemned by the joke.

There is also a more absurd layer: once you suggest someone inside the company recognized the meme, people can start speculating about how many other reviewers recognized it too. Suddenly, a routine content check sounds like a secret society meeting.

What the real karaoke rules actually say

JOYSOUND's official Music Post terms prohibit material that may infringe copyright or image rights, as well as obscene or otherwise improper material. They also allow the service to remove uploads without publicly detailing every decision.

Checking lyrics, audio, video, and ownership is normal moderation work. A reviewer can identify problematic content without being a devoted fan of its source. That distinction matters when talking about actual people.

The confirmed fact is the uploader's report of removal, not an inside account of who reviewed the track or which rule was applied.

A chart hit can still fail the karaoke test

This was no obscure song confined to one message board. “INMU KING” placed second on Oricon's weekly YouTube chart for September 25–October 1, with approximately 3.87 million views during that week.

A YouTube ranking, however, is not permission to distribute a song through karaoke systems. Services have separate checks.

Japanese fans had already laughed about the idea of a store innocently playing the song through background music while knowledgeable customers panic. The JOYSOUND variation flips the scene: this time, the person who might know too much is the one trying to stop the music. Specific claims about USEN airplay are not established here.

The punchline

The documented story concerns an announced registration, a reported removal, and the service's published rules. The viral joke concerns the impossible position of an imaginary reviewer.

“This should not be approved.”

“Okay. And how exactly did you recognize it?”

Congratulations: the karaoke employee has been promoted from content reviewer to defendant in a trial conducted entirely by memes.

References (4)

If this article helped you, you can support the site. Support

Advertisement

One more? Anything fun?

Since you're done reading: a couple of nearby stories and some totally different, fun ones.

  1. NearbyIs It Normal to Take an Adult Child's Phone?When Tracking Stops Being Care
  2. What makes a person "deep"?Resisting easy answers, still deciding
  3. Totally different, but funIs 6 million yen a high salary?Why "all my friends earn it" misleads
  4. Why Strength, Endurance and Cardio Don't Come as One “Fitness +1”
  5. Why Is the Moray Eel Drain-Pipe Tank So Fun to Watch?
  6. Minecraft RunCreeper Blast, Total Loss, and Endless Potato Farming

Read this today

Each one answers a question readers of this article tend to ask next.

Browse all articlesMore on Decisions & comparisons

Find other articles

All articles

Mendoi-chan

Who runs this site

Mendoi-chan

She turns friction at work and in everyday life into clear structure and practical next steps.