Some jobs are valuable because you repeat the exact same steps without slipping: factory work, inspecting products, data entry, cleaning.
Others, like planning, research, improving a process, writing articles, or building software, look different every time but keep heading toward the same goal.
The first is sticking with the motion.
The second is sticking with the goal.
Neither one is better.
They just suit different people.
Say you write articles every day. Each time, the question, the sources, the counterarguments, the structure and the wording are all different.
From the outside, it looks like "they're writing another article."
Inside their head, it's "another dungeon today."
On the other hand, when your job is to attach the same part in the same spot with precision, not changing anything is the strength.
So "I'm bad at repetitive work" doesn't necessarily mean "I can't stick with things."
Figuring out what you can keep doing is more useful than grading your grit.
