Can AI Pick Every Funny Internet Meme? The Strange Windmill Problem

How reading tools work

Listen reads the article aloud. Speed read shows phrases in sequence at your chosen pace. Language practice compares available translations. Save keeps a bookmark in this browser; find it in the player’s bookmarks.

Share this article
Advertisement
Advertisement

A bizarre windmill points straight at you.

Apparently, it has noticed you. Apparently, you should run.

Since when did windmills get permission to identify people?

In October 2026, an odd Japanese meme nicknamed キチガイ風車 — roughly, the bizarre windmill meme — spread on X and appeared in a Yahoo! Japan real-time trend roundup.[1] You don't need to know every reference to appreciate the central absurdity: a windmill is acting like the monster in a horror game.

Someone seeing it might think, before checking any numbers, “This is going to catch on.”

That little prediction is the interesting part.

1. Trending isn't the same as funny

AI can comb through social platforms, notice repeated phrases, trace the original posts, and explain what people are doing with them. Give it enough material and it could label a hundred new items “the meme everyone's talking about.”

Congratulations. You've built a museum with one hundred exhibits and absolutely no one laughing.

Consider a different premise: what would a dog search for on a smartphone? The question is funny before it has an answer. Would the dog Google how to take itself for a walk without waiting for a human?

The windmill has the same extra space for a joke. “A strange windmill went viral” is an announcement. “The windmill has recognized you, and this is somehow your problem” is already a tiny horror story.

A good topic doesn't just have an explanation. It leaves room for one more ridiculous thought.

2. The numbers help, but they can't choose the joke

An anonymized four-day snapshot from a small multilingual site recorded 345 external article views. Memes, fictional worlds, and characters accounted for 240.[D1]

Among articles that received at least one view, 43 in that group averaged 5.58 views; 73 other articles averaged 1.44. Removing each group's five most-viewed articles still left a gap: 2.34 versus 1.21.

Time to publish nothing but memes?

Not so fast. The median article in both groups received just one view, and the top five meme-and-character articles accounted for 62.9% of their group's traffic. Articles with zero views and differences in publication age weren't accounted for equally.

The results point toward promising questions, not a universal license to put a famous character's name in every headline. “What exactly is this?” and “Why did that character do that?” are sharper hooks. Language and local context may matter just as much.

3. Give AI the fishing net; keep the final punchline

Let AI gather emerging memes from different language communities, verify their origins, check real examples of how they're used, and explain them in natural local language.

Then let a human ask three awkward questions: Is it actually funny? Can a newcomer understand why? Is there a second joke hiding inside it?

AI can suggest punchlines too, of course. Human intuition can miss. The sensible approach is to log which picks work and revise the judgment instead of declaring either side infallible.

Google's own guidance values original information and analysis over merely restating existing material.[2] A roundup that says “this is trending” is useful. But the internet already has roundups. It doesn't need an additional warehouse of headlines.

4. Make readers laugh twice

News tells you the windmill became popular.

A good piece explains why the premise is funny, then makes it funny again.

You opened your browser to investigate a windmill. Somehow, by the end, it feels as though the windmill is investigating you.

The research subject has filed a counter-investigation.

Machines are excellent at collecting the world's “What on earth is this?” moments. Human taste still has a useful job: picking the ones that deserve a better “Wait, that's even weirder” ending.

Publishing more explanations isn't the same thing as creating more reasons to laugh.

References (2)

  1. Yahoo! Japan Real-Time Search, 「奇抜な風車ミームがTwitterで話題に 『面白い』『怖い』声も」, 2026-10-08. Yahoo!リアルタイム検索のAI話題まとめであり、通常のYahoo!ニュース編集記事とは別。 search.yahoo.co.jp
  2. Google Search Central, Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content (2026-10-11閲覧) developers.google.com

AdBooks on this topic

This article contains affiliate links (ads). About advertising As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

If this article helped you, you can support the site. Support

Advertisement

One more? Anything fun?

Since you're done reading: a couple of nearby stories and some totally different, fun ones.

  1. NearbyWhy "Husband Should," "Boyfriend Should," and "Family Should" Start Fights
  2. Is the Dancing Rumpelstiltskin From an Old Movie?The VHS Tape That Never Existed
  3. Totally different, but funIf You Stay Passive, Adult Friendships Rarely IncreaseRelationships After Automatic Social Supply Ends
  4. Why Do People Grunt at the Gym?
  5. Why Some Empathy-Driven Anime No Longer Hit You
  6. Kurapika’s Circle Is OverpoweredLie Detection, Hearing, Ability Theft

Read this today

Each one answers a question readers of this article tend to ask next.

Browse all articlesMore on AI

Find other articles

All articles

Mendoi-chan

Who runs this site

Mendoi-chan

She turns friction at work and in everyday life into clear structure and practical next steps.